a comprehensive full report of the research process is called

Home » Research Process – Steps, Examples and Tips

Research Process – Steps, Examples and Tips

Table of Contents

Research Process

The research process is a systematic approach to exploring, analyzing, and discovering information about a specific question or problem. By following an organized sequence of steps, researchers can generate reliable data, form valid conclusions, and contribute valuable knowledge to their field. From defining a research question to reporting findings, each step of the process plays a critical role in producing high-quality, impactful research.

Steps in the Research Process

Definition : Choosing a clear and manageable topic that aligns with the researcher’s interests and field.
Example : A student interested in psychology may choose to explore how social media affects self-esteem.
Choose a topic that is specific enough to be thoroughly explored.
Ensure the topic is relevant to your field or area of study.
Definition : Reviewing existing research to understand what has already been studied and identify gaps in the literature.
Example : A researcher studying climate change might review articles on current mitigation efforts and policies.
Use reliable sources, such as peer-reviewed journals, books, and academic databases.
Organize findings to understand common themes, debates, and research gaps.
Definition : Developing a research question (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative) that provides a clear focus for the study.
Example : A hypothesis could be, “Increased screen time is associated with lower levels of physical activity in teenagers.”
Formulate a research question that is clear, focused, and researchable.
Ensure that the question or hypothesis aligns with the literature review findings.
Definition : Selecting a research approach (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods) and specifying the methods for data collection and analysis.
Example : A researcher might use surveys to gather quantitative data on exercise habits, or conduct interviews for qualitative insights.
Select methods that best answer the research question and are feasible within available resources.
Consider ethical implications and obtain any necessary approvals.
Definition : Gathering information relevant to the research question or hypothesis using the chosen methods.
Example : In a study on nutrition, data might be collected via food diaries, questionnaires, or focus groups.
Follow standardized procedures to ensure consistency and accuracy.
Document the data collection process thoroughly for transparency.
Definition : Interpreting data through statistical or thematic analysis to identify patterns, relationships, or trends.
Example : In a study on stress, data analysis might involve coding interview responses or performing statistical tests on survey responses.
Use appropriate tools and techniques (e.g., SPSS, R, or NVivo) based on the data type.
Ensure that data analysis aligns with the research design to accurately answer the research question.
Definition : Explaining the results in the context of the research question, and comparing them to findings from the literature review.
Example : A study finding that regular exercise reduces stress might discuss how this aligns with or differs from previous research.
Acknowledge any limitations of the study and suggest areas for future research.
Relate findings back to the hypothesis or research question, explaining the implications.
Definition : Summarizing the main findings and their significance, and making final conclusions based on the results.
Example : Concluding that social media positively influences self-esteem among certain age groups, based on the study’s findings.
Keep conclusions aligned with data and avoid overgeneralizing.
Address how the study contributes to the existing body of knowledge.
Definition : Presenting research findings through a research paper, report, or presentation, detailing methods, results, and conclusions.
Example : Publishing a study on diet and exercise in a health journal or presenting at a conference.
Follow formatting guidelines for journals or conferences (e.g., APA, MLA).
Use visuals like tables and charts to present data clearly.

Examples of Research Processes in Different Fields

Topic : Impact of mindfulness on reducing anxiety.
Process : The researcher begins with a literature review on mindfulness and anxiety, forms a hypothesis, designs an experiment with a control and test group, collects data through self-report surveys, analyzes results with statistical software, interprets findings, and concludes that mindfulness practices effectively reduce anxiety levels.
Topic : Influence of remote work on productivity.
Process : The researcher conducts a literature review on workplace productivity, designs a survey, collects data from employees, and performs quantitative analysis. The findings suggest that remote work has mixed effects on productivity, and the results are reported in a business journal.
Topic : Assessing the effectiveness of urban green spaces on reducing pollution.
Process : The researcher reviews studies on pollution reduction, forms a hypothesis, uses air quality sensors in green and non-green urban areas to collect data, analyzes the data to assess pollution levels, and concludes that green spaces reduce urban air pollution.

Tips for Conducting Effective Research

Start with a Clear Plan : Outline the research process step-by-step before starting to ensure you stay organized and focused.
Stay Open to New Information : Be flexible in adapting your research question or methods if new findings emerge during the literature review.
Use Reliable Sources : Always verify sources, especially online, to ensure the credibility of the literature review.
Follow Ethical Guidelines : Obtain necessary approvals if working with human subjects, and follow ethical standards in all stages of research.
Manage Time Efficiently : Set realistic timelines for each step, especially data collection and analysis, to avoid delays.
Document Every Step : Keep records of all research activities, from data collection to interpretation, for transparency and replicability.
Use Software and Tools : Leverage research tools (like EndNote for citations, SPSS for data analysis, and Trello for task management) to enhance efficiency and accuracy.
Seek Feedback : Share drafts of your work with peers or mentors to get constructive feedback before finalizing your report.
Prepare for Peer Review : If publishing, anticipate reviewer comments by ensuring clarity, relevance, and thoroughness in your research paper.

Common Challenges in the Research Process

Narrowing the Topic : Broad research topics can lead to vague results; focus on a specific aspect to make your study manageable.
Access to Resources : Lack of access to essential resources (e.g., journals, databases) can hinder the literature review; explore open-access journals and library databases.
Bias in Data Collection : Researchers may unintentionally influence participants; design objective questions and control variables to mitigate bias.
Data Analysis Complexity : Choosing the wrong analysis method can lead to misleading conclusions; consult statistical guidelines or seek expert assistance if needed.

The research process is a structured, step-by-step approach that ensures accuracy, credibility, and thoroughness in exploring a research question. By following the outlined steps, researchers can build upon existing knowledge, make meaningful contributions to their fields, and communicate findings effectively. With the right tools, techniques, and discipline, the research process becomes a valuable journey of discovery and learning.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches . SAGE Publications.
Kumar, R. (2014). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners . SAGE Publications.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students . Pearson Education.
Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2008). The Research Methods Knowledge Base . Cengage Learning.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

Dissertation vs Thesis – Key Differences

Purpose of Research – Objectives and Applications

Significance of the Study – Examples and Writing...

Theoretical Framework – Types, Examples and...

Research Problem – Examples, Types and Guide

Dissertation – Format, Example and Template

Overview of the Research Process

First Online: 01 January 2012

Cite this chapter

a comprehensive full report of the research process is called

Phyllis G. Supino EdD 3

6495 Accesses

2 Citations

1 Altmetric

Research is a rigorous problem-solving process whose ultimate goal is the discovery of new knowledge. Research may include the description of a new phenomenon, definition of a new relationship, development of a new model, or application of an existing principle or procedure to a new context. Research is systematic, logical, empirical, reductive, replicable and transmittable, and generalizable. Research can be classified according to a variety of dimensions: basic, applied, or translational; hypothesis generating or hypothesis testing; retrospective or prospective; longitudinal or cross-sectional; observational or experimental; and quantitative or qualitative. The ultimate success of a research project is heavily dependent on adequate planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

Get 10 units per month
Download Article/Chapter or eBook
1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
Cancel anytime
Available as EPUB and PDF
Read on any device
Instant download
Own it forever
Compact, lightweight edition
Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
Free shipping worldwide - see info
Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Research: Meaning and Purpose

The Roadmap to Research: Fundamentals of a Multifaceted Research Process

Research Questions and Research Design

Calvert J, Martin BR (2001) Changing conceptions of basic research? Brighton, England: Background document for the Workshop on Policy Relevance and Measurement of Basic Research, Oslo, 29–30 Oct 2001. Brighton, England: SPRU.

Google Scholar

Leedy PD. Practical research. Planning and design. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1997.

Tuckman BW. Conducting educational research. 3rd ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1972.

Tanenbaum SJ. Knowing and acting in medical practice. The epistemological policies of outcomes research. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1994;19:27–44.

Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Richardson WS. We should overcome the barriers to evidence-based clinical diagnosis! J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:217–27.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

MacCorquodale K, Meehl PE. On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psych Rev. 1948;55:95–107.

Article CAS Google Scholar

The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research: The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington: DHEW Publication No. (OS) 78–0012, Appendix I, DHEW Publication No. (OS) 78–0013, Appendix II, DHEW Publication (OS) 780014; 1978.

Coryn CLS. The fundamental characteristics of research. J Multidisciplinary Eval. 2006;3:124–33.

Smith NL, Brandon PR. Fundamental issues in evaluation. New York: Guilford; 2008.

Committee on Criteria for Federal Support of Research and Development, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, National Research Council. Allocating federal funds for science and technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies; 1995.

Busse R, Fleming I. A critical look at cardiovascular translational research. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1999;277:H1655–60.

CAS Google Scholar

Schuster DP, Powers WJ. Translational and experimental clinical research. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Williams; 2005.

Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008;299:211–21.

Robertson D, Williams GH. Clinical and translational science: principles of human research. London: Elsevier; 2009.

Goldblatt EM, Lee WH. From bench to bedside: the growing use of translational research in cancer medicine. Am J Transl Res. 2010;2:1–18.

PubMed Google Scholar

Milloy SJ. Science without sense: the risky business of public health research. In: Chapter 5, Mining for statistical associations. Cato Institute. 2009. http://www.junkscience.com/news/sws/sws-chapter5.html . Retrieved 29 Oct 2009.

Gawande A. The cancer-cluster myth. The New Yorker, 8 Feb 1999, p. 34–37.

Kerlinger F. [Chapter 2: problems and hypotheses]. In: Foundations of behavioral research 3rd edn. Orlando: Harcourt, Brace; 1986.

Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124. Epub 2005 Aug 30.

Andersen B. Methodological errors in medical research. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1990.

DeAngelis C. An introduction to clinical research. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990.

Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Epidemiology in medicine. 1st ed. Boston: Little Brown; 1987.

Jekel JF. Epidemiology, biostatistics, and preventive medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2007.

Hess DR. Retrospective studies and chart reviews. Respir Care. 2004;49:1171–4.

Wissow L, Pascoe J. Types of research models and methods (chapter four). In: An introduction to clinical research. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990.

Bacchieri A, Della Cioppa G. Fundamentals of clinical research: bridging medicine, statistics and operations. Milan: Springer; 2007.

Wood MJ, Ross-Kerr JC. Basic steps in planning nursing research. From question to proposal. 6th ed. Boston: Jones and Barlett; 2005.

DeVita VT, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA, Weinberg RA, DePinho RA. Cancer. Principles and practice of oncology, vol. 1. Philadelphia: Wolters Klewer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research. Applications to practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Health; 2000.

Marks RG. Designing a research project. The basics of biomedical research methodology. Belmont: Lifetime Learning Publications: A division of Wadsworth; 1982.

Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet. 1991;337:867–72.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, 1199, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA

Phyllis G. Supino EdD

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phyllis G. Supino EdD .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

, Cardiovascular Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Clarkson Avenue, box 1199 450, Brooklyn, 11203, USA

Phyllis G. Supino

, Cardiovascualr Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Clarkson Avenue 450, Brooklyn, 11203, USA

Jeffrey S. Borer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Supino, P.G. (2012). Overview of the Research Process. In: Supino, P., Borer, J. (eds) Principles of Research Methodology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3360-6_1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3360-6_1

Published : 18 April 2012

Publisher Name : Springer, New York, NY

Print ISBN : 978-1-4614-3359-0

Online ISBN : 978-1-4614-3360-6

eBook Packages : Medicine Medicine (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Find a journal
Track your research