- Gottesman & Shields AO1 AO3
- Kety AO1 AO3
- Evolutionary Psychology AO1 AO2 AO3
- Drugs & the Brain AO1 AO2 AO3
- Brendgen AO1 AO3
- Development (Maturation) AO1 AO2 AO3
- Aggression & Freud AO1 AO2 AO3
- Development & Freud AO1 AO2 AO3
- Individual Differences & Freud AO1 AO2 AO3
- Raine AO1 AO3
- Biological Key Question AO1 AO2
- Baddeley AO1 AO3
- Multi Store Model AO1 AO2 AO3
- Reconstructive Memory AO1 AO2 AO3
- Schmolck AO1 AO3
- Tulving's Long Term Memory AO1 AO2 AO3
- Working Memory AO1 AO2 AO3
- Cognitive Key Question AO1 AO2
- Bandura AO3
- Becker AO1 AO3
- Classical Conditioning AO1 AO2 AO3
- Operant Conditioning AO1 AO2 AO3
- Pavlov AO1 AO3
- Social Learning AO1 AO2 AO3
- Systematic Desensitisation
- Watson & Rayner AO1 AO3
- Learning Key Question AO1 AO2
- Agency Theory AO1 AO2 AO3
- Burger AO1 AO3
- Situational Factors AO1 AO2 AO3
- Milgram AO3
- Realistic Conflict Theory AO1 AO2 AO3
- Social Impact Theory AO1 AO2 AO3
- Social Identity Theory AO1 AO2 AO3
- Social Key Question AO1 AO2
- Biological Explanation AO1 AO2
- Non-Biological Explanation AO1 AO2
- Biological Treatment AO1 AO2
- Psychological Treatment AO1 AO2
- Diagnosing Abnormality AO1 AO2 AO3
- Diagnostic Manuals AO1 AO2 AO3
- Carlsson AO1 AO3
- Kroenke AO1 AO3
- HCPC Guidelines AO1 AO2 AO3
- Rosenhan AO1 AO3
- Non-biological Explanation AO1 AO2
- Biological Treatments AO1 AO2
- Clinical Key Question AO1 AO2
- Social Control AO2 AO3
- Ethics AO1 AO2 AO3
- Personality AO1 AO2 AO3
- Mental Health Differences AO1 AO2 AO3
- Differences in Obedience & Prejudice AO1 AO2 AO3
- Loftus study AO1 AO2 AO3
- Nature vs Nurture AO1 AO2 AO3
- Scientific Status AO1 AO2
- Animal Studies AO1 AO2 AO3
- Bradshaw AO1 AO3
- Scoville & Milner AO1 AO3
- Content Analyses AO1 AO2 AO3
- Experimental Method AO1 AO2 AO3
- Experimental Variables AO1 AO2
- Hypotheses AO1 AO2
- Chi-Squared Test AO1 AO2
- Mann-Whitney U Test AO1 AO2
- Spearman's Rho AO1 AO2
- Wilcoxon Test AO1 AO2
- Longitudinal Design AO1 AO2 AO3
- Quantitative Data & Analysis AO1 AO2 AO3
- Research Design AO1 AO2 AO3
- Sampling AO1 AO2 AO3
- Brown et al. AO1 AO3
BURGER (2009) REPLICATING MILGRAM
- There was a two-step screening process to filter out anyone who might be unduly stressed by the experience
- The participants were warned 3 times in writing that they could withdraw at any point and still keep the $50
- The experimenter was actually a clinical psychologist, skilled in spotting and reacting appropriately to distress
- The "test shock" experienced by the participants was only a mild 15V, not Milgram's painful 45V
- Burger did not allow time to pass before he introduced the (healthy) learner and debriefed the participants
Within a few seconds of the study’s end, the learner entered the room to reassure the participant that he was fine - Jerry Burger
my partial replication of Milgram’s procedure suggests that average Americans react to this laboratory situation today much the way they did 45 years ago - Jerry Burger
Participants who were high in empathic concern expressed a reluctance to continue the procedure earlier than did those who were low on this trait. But this early reluctance did not translate into a greater likelihood of refusing to continue - Jerry Burger
It is not clear why the presence of the refusing model would undermine this tendency. One possibility is that the base condition may have represented more of a me-versus-him situation that consequently triggered a desire to assert personal control - Jerry Burger
IMAGES