A Systematic Review of Human–Computer Interaction and Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare With Artificial Intelligence Techniques

Ieee account.

  • Change Username/Password
  • Update Address

Purchase Details

  • Payment Options
  • Order History
  • View Purchased Documents

Profile Information

  • Communications Preferences
  • Profession and Education
  • Technical Interests
  • US & Canada: +1 800 678 4333
  • Worldwide: +1 732 981 0060
  • Contact & Support
  • About IEEE Xplore
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Nondiscrimination Policy
  • Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. © Copyright 2024 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.

How HCI Interprets Service Design: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online: 26 August 2021
  • Cite this conference paper

hci literature review

  • Christine Ee Ling Yap 15 ,
  • Jung-Joo Lee 15 &
  • Virpi Roto 16  

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12933))

Included in the following conference series:

  • IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

3455 Accesses

3 Citations

The scope of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research is expanding with regard to the studied systems and stakeholders, and its impact areas. Service design has recently gained tractions in HCI as an approach to deal with these expansions. However, there has been confusion around the definitions and roles of service design in HCI, especially with its overlaps and differences with interaction design. To examine how HCI has adopted service design, this paper presents results from a systematic literature review on 52 papers from the most cited HCI publication venues. Our findings show that the adoption of service design concepts and methods in HCI has been sporadic over the past decade. The term service design has been interpreted as a variety of meanings. The most predominantly observed understandings include service design as a term for designing digital services instead of products, and as an approach providing a journey and system perspective to the design of social computing, Internet of Things, or other complex systems. Only a few studies adopted the fundamental logic of new value exchange or co-creation of systems from service design. We discuss the reasons behind the differing interpretations of service design by HCI and future opportunities for HCI to better benefit from service design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

hci literature review

Design Research: Methodological Innovation Through Messiness

hci literature review

Service Design: Innovation for Complex Systems

hci literature review

Bringing Design Science Research to Service Design

Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Clemmensen, T.: Socio-technical HCI for ethical value exchange. In: Clemmensen, T., Rajamanickam, V., Dannenmann, P., Petrie, H., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2017. LNCS, vol. 10774, pp. 148–159. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92081-8_15

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Alhonsuo, M., Hapuli, J., Virtanen, L., Colley, A., Häkkilä, J.: Concepting wearables for ice-hockey youth. In: Proceedings of MobileHCI 2015, pp. 944–946. ACM (2015)

Google Scholar  

Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Wiberg, M.: User driven service design and innovation platforms. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2013. CCIS, vol. 373, pp. 3–7. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39473-7_1

Bhandari, G., Snowdon, A.: Design of a patient-centric, service-oriented health care navigation system for a local health integration network. Behav. Inf. Technol. 31 (3), 275–285 (2012)

Article   Google Scholar  

Bisht, S.S., Mishra, V.: ICT-driven financial inclusion initiatives for urban poor in a developing economy: implications for public policy. Behav. Inf. Technol. 35 (10), 817–832 (2016)

Bitner, M.J.: Servicescapes: the impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. J. Mark. 56 (2), 57–71 (1992)

Bitner, M.J., Booms, B.H., Tetreault, M.S.: The service encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. J. Mark. 54 (1), 71–84 (1990)

Blevis, E.: Sustainable interaction design: invention and disposal, renewal and reuse. In: Proceedings of CHI 2007, pp. 503–512. ACM (2007)

Blomberg, J., Evenson, S.: Service innovation and design. In: Proceedings of CHI EA 2006, pp. 28–31. ACM (2006)

Blomberg, J.: Participation frameworks in service design and delivery. In: Proceedings of PDC 2010, p. 299. ACM (2010)

Boehner, K., Vertesi, J., Sengers, P., Dourish, P.: How HCI interprets the probes. In: Proceedings of CHI 2007, pp. 1077–1086. ACM (2007)

Buchanan, R.: Design research and the new learning. Des. Issues 17 (4), 3–23 (2001)

Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Des. Issues 8 , 5–21 (1992)

Burda, D., Teuteberg, F.: Exploring consumer preferences in cloud archiving – a student’s perspective. Behav. Inf. Technol. 35 (2), 89–105 (2016)

Chakraborty, A., Hargude, A.N.: Dabbawala: introducing technology to the Dabbawalas of Mumbai. In: Proceedings of MobileHCI 2015, pp. 660–667. ACM (2015)

Chand, A., Gonzalez, M., Missig, J., Phanichphant, P., Sun, P.F.: Balance pass: service design for a healthy college lifestyle. In: CHI EA 2006, pp. 1813–1818. ACM (2006)

Chen, T.-H., Lin, H.-H., Yen, Y.-D.: Mojo iCuisine: the design and implementation of an interactive restaurant tabletop menu. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2011. LNCS, vol. 6763, pp. 185–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21616-9_21

Clatworthy, S.: Service innovation through touch-points: development of an in-novation toolkit for the first stages of new service development. Int. J. Des. 5 (2) (2011)

Colley, A., Häkkilä, J.: Service design methods for human computer interaction. In: Proceedings of MUM 2018, pp. 563–566. ACM (2018)

Colley, A., Marttila, H.: Introduction to service design for digital health. In: Bernhaupt, R., Dalvi, G., Joshi, A., K. Balkrishan, D., O’Neill, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2017. LNCS, vol. 10516, pp. 395–398. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68059-0_38

Colley, A., Rantakari, J., Häkkilä, J.: Dual sided tablet supporting doctor-patient interaction. In: Proceedings of CSCW'15 Companion 2015, pp. 13–16. ACM (2015)

Davoli, L., Redström, J.: Materializing infrastructures for participatory hacking. In: Proceedings of DIS 2014, pp. 121–130. ACM (2014)

de Sá, M., Churchill, E.: Mobile augmented reality: exploring design and prototyping techniques. In: Proceedings of MOBILEHCI ‘2012, pp. 221–230. ACM (2012)

Edgett, S., Parkinson, S.: Marketing for service industries. Serv. Indust. J. 13 (3), 19–39 (1993)

Elo, S., Kyngäs, H.: The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs. 62 (1), 107–115 (2008)

Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J.: Promoting service design as a core practice in interaction design. In: 5th IASDR World Conference on Design Research 2013. IASDR Press (2013)

Forlizzi, J.: All look same? a comparison of experience design and service design. Interactions 17 (5), 60–62 (2010)

Forlizzi, J.: Moving beyond user-centered design. Interactions 25 (5), 22–23 (2018)

Friedman, B., Hendry, D.G.: Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. MIT Press (2019)

Fry, T.: Design Futuring: Sustainability, ethics and New Practice. Berg, Oxford, UK (2009)

Book   Google Scholar  

Fu, Z.: Design for public service application based on collective intelligence in China. In: RDURP 2011, pp. 3–6. ACM (2011)

Harrington, K., Fulton, P., Brown, M., Pinchin, J., Sharples, S.: Digital wellbeing assessments for people affected by dementia. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9171, pp. 409–418. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21006-3_39

Hayakawa, S., Ueda, Y., Go, K., Takahash, K., Yanagida, K., Yamazaki, K.: User research for experience vision. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8004, pp. 77–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39232-0_9

Holmlid, S.: Interaction design and service design: expanding a comparison of design disciplines. In: Nordes 2007 (2007)

Hyvärinen, J., Lee, J.-J., Mattelmäki, T.: Fragile Liaisons: challenges in cross-organizational service networks and the role of design. Des. J. 18 (2), 249–268 (2015)

Inbar, O., Tractinsky, N.: Interface-to-face: sharing information with customers in service encounters. In: CHI EA 2010, pp. 3415–3420. ACM (2010)

Inbar, O., Tractinsky, N.: Lowering the line of visibility: incidental users in service encounters. Behav. Inf. Technol. 31 (3), 245–260 (2012)

Itoh, Y., et al.: Communication service design by interhuman interaction approach. In: CHI EA 2006, pp. 905–910. ACM (2006)

Kankainen, A., Vaajakallio, K., Kantola, V., Mattelmäki, T.: Storytelling group – a co-design method for service design. Behav. Inf. Technol. 31 (3), 221–230 (2012)

Kim, E., Koh, B., Ng, J., Su, R.: myPyramid: increasing nutritional awareness. In: CHI EA 2006, pp. 1843–1848. ACM (2006)

Kim, H.-J., Kim, C.M., Nam, T.-J.: SketchStudio: experience prototyping with 2.5-dimensional animated design scenarios. In: Proceedings of DIS 2018, pp. 831–843. ACM (2018)

Kim, S., et al.: Autonomous taxi service design and user experience. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 36 (5), 429–448 (2019)

Kimbell, L.: Designing for service as one way of designing services. Int. J. Des. 5 , 41–52 (2011)

Kotamraju, N.P., van der Geest, T.M.: The tension between user-centred design and e-government services. Behav. Inf. Technol. 31 (3), 261–273 (2012)

Lee, J.J.: Service design and blind mice. Interactions 27 (2), 20–21 (2020)

Lee, M.K., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., Rybski, P., Antanitis, J., Savetsila, S.: Personalization in HRI: a longitudinal field experiment. In: Proceedings of HRI 2012, pp. 319–326. ACM (2012)

Lee, M.K., Kielser, S., Forlizzi, J., Srinivasa, S., Rybski, P.: Gracefully mitigating breakdowns in robotic services. In: Proceedings of HRI 2010, pp. 203–210. IEEE Press (2010)

Lee, M.K., Kiesler, S., Forlizzi, J., Rybski, P.: Ripple effects of an embedded social agent: a field study of a social robot in the workplace. In: Proceedings of CHI 2012, pp. 695–704. ACM (2012)

Lee, M.K., Kim, J.T., Lizarondo, L.: A human-centered approach to algorithmic services: considerations for fair and motivating smart community service management that allocates donations to non-profit organizations. In: CHI 2017, pp. 3365–3376. ACM (2017)

Liu, X., Qian, D., Wu, L., Xu, J.: Assessment of the working chair using affects the whole service process in b ultrasonic examination. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2017. CCIS, vol. 713, pp. 540–547. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58750-9_75

Lovelock, C., Gummesson, E.: Whither services marketing? In: Search of a New Paradigm and Fresh Perspectives. Journal of Service Research 7(1), 20–41 (2004).

Lundberg, J., Arvola, M., Westin, C., Holmlid, S., Nordvall, M., Josefsson, B.: Cognitive work analysis in the conceptual design of first-of-a-kind systems – designing urban air traffic management. Behav. Inf. Technol. 37 (9), 904–925 (2018)

Lusch, R., Nambisan, S.: Service innovation: a service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Q. 39 , 155–175 (2015)

Mager, B.: Service design as an emerging field. In: Miettinen, S., Koivisto, M. (eds.) Designing Services with Innovative Methods. Otava Book Printing LTD, Keu-ruu, Finland (2009)

Mager, B.: Service Design Impact Report: Public Sector. Service Design Network, Cologne (2016). http://www.service-design-network.org/books-and-reports/impact-report-public-sector

Meckem, S., Carlson, J.L.: Using “rapid experimentation” to inform customer service experience design. In: CHI EA 2010, pp. 4553–4566. ACM (2010)

Meroni, A., Sangiorgi, D.: Design for Services. Gower (2011)

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G.: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6 (7), e1000097 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Nardi, B.: Designing for the future: but which one? Interactions 23 (1), 26–33 (2016)

Pacenti, E., Sangiorgi, D.: Service Design research pioneers: an overview of Service Design research developed in Italy since the ’90s. Swedish Des. Res. J. 1 (10), 26–33 (2010)

Patrício, L., Fisk, R.P., Falcão e Cunha, J., Constantine, L.: Multilevel service design: from customer value constellation to service experience blueprinting. J. Serv. Res. 14 (2), 180–200 (2011)

Patrício, L., Gustafsson, A., Fisk, R.: Upframing service design and innovation for research impact. J. Serv. Res. 21 (1), 3–16 (2017)

Polaine, A., Reason, B., Løvlie, L.: Service Design: From Insight to Implementation. Rosenfeld Media (2013)

Rau, P.-L.P., Huang, E., Mao, M., Gao, Q., Feng, C., Zhang, Y.: Exploring interactive style and user experience design for social web of things of Chinese users: a case study in Beijing. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 80 , 24–35 (2015)

Remy, C., et al..: Evaluation Beyond Usability: Validating Sustainable HCI Research. In: Proceedings of CHI 2018 2018, p. Paper 216. ACM (2018)

Roto, V., Lee, J. J., Law, F., Zimmerman, J.: The overlaps and boundaries between service design and user experience design. In Proceedings of DIS 2021, ACM (2021)

Roto, V., Lee, J. J., Mattelmäki, T., Zimmerman, J.: Experience design meets service design: method clash or marriage? In: CHI EA 2018, p. Paper W26. ACM (2018)

Secomandi, F., Snelders, D.: Interface design in services: a postphenomenological approach. Des. Issues 29 (1), 3–13 (2013)

Shostack, L.G.: How to design a service. Eur. J. Mark. 16 (1), 49–63 (1982)

Szóstek, A., Kwiatkowska, J., Górnicka, O.: The needs of early school children and their parents with respect to the design of mobile service offers. In: CHI EA 2013, pp. 2345–2346. ACM (2013)

Stenros, J., Sotamaa, O.: Commoditization of helping players play: rise of the service paradigm. In: DiGRA Conference 2009 (2009)

Teixeira, J., Patrício, L., Nunes, N.J., Nóbrega, L.: Customer experience modeling: designing interactions for service systems. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6949, pp. 136–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23768-3_11

Ueda, Y., Go, K., Takahashi, K., Hayakawa, S., Yamazaki, K., Yanagida, K.: Structured scenario-based design method for experience vision. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8004, pp. 500–509. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39232-0_54

V.S., S., Hirom, U., Lobo, S., Devkar, S., Doke, P., Pandey, N.: Participatory design of vaccination services with less-literate users. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2017. CCIS, vol. 714, pp. 301–308. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58753-0_45

Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Mark. 68 (1), 1–17 (2004)

Vilaza, G.N., Mähönen, J., Hamon, C., Danilina, O.: StreetHeart: Empowering homeless through art and technology. In: CHI EA 2017, pp. 93–99. ACM (2017)

Wienken, T., Krömker, H.: Experience maps for mobility. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2018. LNCS, vol. 10902, pp. 615–627. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91244-8_47

Wild, P.J., van Dijk, G., Maiden, N.: New opportunities for services and human–computer interaction. Behav. Inf. Technol. 31 (3), 205–208 (2012)

Wild, P.J.: HCI and the analysis, design, and evaluation of services. In: BCS - HCI 2008, pp. 207–208. BCS Learning & Development Ltd. (2008)

Williams, D., Kelly, G., Anderson, L.: MSN 9: new user-centered desirability methods produce compelling visual design. In: CHI EA 2004, pp. 959–974. ACM (2004)

Wong, R.Y., Khovanskaya, V.: Speculative Design in HCI: from corporate imaginations to critical orientations. In: Filimowicz, M., Tzankova, V. (eds.) New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction: Volume 2 - Methodologies. HIS, pp. 175–202. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_10

Wu, C.-C., Hong, S.-M., Huang, Y.-H.: GoodGuide: reconnecting the homeless and others. In: CHI EA 2015, pp. 55–60. ACM (2015)

Yamazaki, K., Go, K., Takahashi, K., Hayakawa, S., Ueda, Y., Yanagida, K.: Proposal for experience vision. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8004, pp. 137–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39232-0_16

Yang, C.-F., Sung, T.-J.: Service design for social innovation through participatory action research. Int. J. Des. 10 , 21–36 (2016)

Yang, Q., Zimmerman, J., Steinfeld, A., Carey, L., Antaki, J.F.: Investigating the heart pump implant decision process: opportunities for decision support tools to help. In: CHI 2016, pp. 4477–4488. ACM (2016)

Yi, T., Rhim, J., Lee, I., Narangerel, A., Lee, J.-H.: Service design of intergeneration home-sharing system using VR-based simulation technology and optimal matching algorithms. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2017. CCIS, vol. 714, pp. 95–100. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58753-0_15

Yoo, D., Ernest, A., Serholt, S., Eriksson, E., Dalsgaard, P.: Service design in HCI research: the extended value co-creation model. In: HTTF 2019, p. Article 17. ACM (2019)

Yoo, D., Zimmerman, J., Hirsch, T.: Probing bus stop for insights on transit co-design. In: CHI 2013, pp. 409–418. ACM (2013)

Yoo, D., Zimmerman, J., Steinfeld, A., Tomasic, A.: Understanding the space for co-design in riders’ interactions with a transit service. In: Proceedings of CHI 2010, pp. 1797–1806. ACM (2010)

Yoo, J., Pan, Y.: Expanded customer journey map: interaction mapping framework based on scenario. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2014. CCIS, vol. 435, pp. 550–555. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07854-0_96

Yu, E.: Looking into service representation tools through the multidimensional nature of service experience. Des. J. 22 (4), 437–461 (2019)

Yu, E.: Toward an integrative service design framework and future agendas. Des. Issues 36 (2), 41–57 (2020)

Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A., Berry, L.L.: Problems and strategies in services marketing. J. Mark. 49 (2), 33–46 (1985)

Zhao, S.: Research on future-oriented manager service design under the background of new retail. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2018. CCIS, vol. 852, pp. 343–355. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92285-0_47

Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J.: Service design. In: The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction (2019)

Zimmerman, J., et al.: Field trial of Tiramisu: crowd-sourcing bus arrival times to spur co-design. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011, pp. 1677–1686. ACM (2011)

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Christine Ee Ling Yap & Jung-Joo Lee

Aalto University, Espoo, Finland

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Ee Ling Yap .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy

Carmelo Ardito

Computer Science Department, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy

Rosa Lanzilotti

Computer Science Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Alessio Malizia

Department of Computer Science, University of York, York, UK

Helen Petrie

Antonio Piccinno

Giuseppe Desolda

Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA

Kori Inkpen

1.1 Top 20 HCI Publication Venues Used in This Study

The full list of all 83 papers and how they are categorized in this study can be found at https://www.notion.so/List-of-papers-in-used-in-systematic-literature-review-566010db676c402182595758e0d2fbb9 .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Cite this paper.

Yap, C.E.L., Lee, JJ., Roto, V. (2021). How HCI Interprets Service Design: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Ardito, C., et al. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021. INTERACT 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12933. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85616-8_16

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85616-8_16

Published : 26 August 2021

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-85615-1

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-85616-8

eBook Packages : Computer Science Computer Science (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships

The International Federation for Information Processing

  • Find a journal
  • Track your research

IMAGES

  1. (PDF) Literature Reviews in HCI: A Review of Reviews

    hci literature review

  2. Literature Reviews in HCI: A Review of Reviews

    hci literature review

  3. Cruising Queer HCI on the DL: A Literature Review of LGBTQ+ People in

    hci literature review

  4. Machine Learning in Mental Health: A Systematic Review of the HCI

    hci literature review

  5. (PDF) Exploring the Referral and Usage of Science Fiction in HCI Literature

    hci literature review

  6. (PDF) A Literature Review of Video-Sharing Platform Research in HCI

    hci literature review

VIDEO

  1. Midterm Exam Review

  2. Introduction to HCI

  3. Comparing Microsoft HCI Solutions from Dell Technologies

  4. HCI assignment

  5. HCI2021-L02: What is HCI?

  6. Introduction To HCI

COMMENTS

  1. Literature Reviews in HCI: A Review of Reviews

    This paper contributes the following: (i) an account of the contribution types offered by literature reviews in HCI; (ii) an overview of review topics that literature reviews in HCI have addressed to date, (iii) information on methodological approaches (e.g. databases used) for literature reviews at all SIGCHI conferences and TOCHI; (iv) current gaps and and future opportunities for meta work ...

  2. A Systematic Literature Review for Human-Computer Interaction and

    A Systematic Literature Review for HCI and DT Process Integration 731 4.3 Results Analysis Collectively, articles were found to re fl ect on design viewpoints on the nature of desig n

  3. (PDF) Literature Reviews in HCI: A Review of Reviews

    This paper analyses Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) literature reviews to provide a clear conceptual basis for authors, reviewers, and readers. HCI is multidisciplinary and various types of ...

  4. A Systematic Literature Review for Human-Computer Interaction and

    In the initial 'planning' phase, we reviewed 14 articles that focused on systematic literature review of concepts close to HCI and DT, including engineering design, design education, and interaction design. Our goal with this phase was to identify the selection and exclusion criteria commonly that would be most suitable for our purposes of ...

  5. A Systematic Review of Human-Computer Interaction and Explainable

    The understanding of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), which is a linking point of HCI and XAI, was gained through a literature review conducted in this research. The literature survey encompassed themes identified in the literature (such as XAI and its areas, major XAI aims, and XAI problems and challenges).

  6. A Systematic Review of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) Research in

    This article addresses this need by providing a systematic literature review of a cross-section of HCI approaches involving proposed so far. The PRISMA-guided search strategy identified 1156 articles for abstract review. Irrelevant abstracts were discarded. The whole body of each article was reviewed for the remaining articles, and those that ...

  7. Review Trust models and theories in human-computer interaction: A

    The primary focus of these research questions is the examination of trust within the HCI literature, addressing its various contexts as listed in Table 4. Our analysis, detailed in Table 5, categorizes the literature into empirical studies, which form the majority with 42 papers (89.36%) exploring trust-related hypotheses quantitatively, and ...

  8. Literature Reviews in HCI: A Review of Reviews

    This paper analyses Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) literature reviews to provide a clear conceptual basis for authors, reviewers, and readers and identifies gaps and trends to inform future meta work in HCI. This paper analyses Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) literature reviews to provide a clear conceptual basis for authors, reviewers, and readers. HCI is multidisciplinary and various ...

  9. Machine Learning in Mental Health: A Systematic Review of the HCI

    As is perhaps less surprising in a review of the computing and HCI literature on "ML applications" in mental health, we found that the majority of papers focused on the technical or algorithmic development of initial ML models (Section 3.5.1).

  10. How HCI Interprets Service Design: A Systematic Literature Review

    A systematic literature review was conducted and reported according to the PRISMA statement to identify existing literature in HCI that adopt service design as a process, method, logic, or practice. We searched for the term "service design" in the top 20 publication venues in the field of HCI (according to Google Scholar metrics, as of July ...